CIWF Logo Food Business
Search icon

Food System Transformation: Science Calls For Action On Diets And Food Production

Scientific research supports the call for urgent fundamental changes in the way we produce and consume food for the sake of our own health, the climate and the environment. We must transform our food system if we are to address the multi-dimensional challenges of producing sufficient, safe and nutritious food for all within the safe operating space of all nine planetary boundaries.2

The evolution of the planetary boundaries framework

As of 2023, six of the nine planetary boundaries – climate change, land-system change, freshwater change, biosphere integrity (biodiversity loss), novel entities (artificial toxic and long-lived substances), and biogeochemical cycles (phosphorus and nitrogen particularly from industrial agriculture) – have already been crossed as a result of human activity.

Without a new food system, we will not be able to address the global health crisis, meet the targets of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, achieve the objectives of the Paris Climate Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity whilst also meeting the needs of a rising population projected to be around 10 billion by 2050.

A clear majority of credible scientific papers – the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the Intergovernmental Science Platform on Biodiversity (IPBES), and the EAT-Lancet Commission – conclude that meat and dairy must begin to play a much smaller role in our daily diets.

Our Failing Food System: Hunger, Waste And Unsustainable Practices

Despite years of increased investment, research and development and technological advancement, there remain significant failings in our food system.

Right now, more than 1.3 billion people do not have enough to eat, whilst according to the Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) the world wastes approximately 2.5 billion tonnes of edible food every year (FAO, 2016).4

At the same time two billion men, women and children are overweight or obese7, with poor diets being responsible for more deaths than any other risk factor8. The overconsumption of meat, dairy and eggs in developed regions exceeds both dietary guidelines and new planetary diet guidelines.

The United Nations in 2016, reported that food production, when not sustainably managed, is a major driver of biodiversity loss and polluter of air, fresh water and oceans, as well as a leading source of soil degradation and greenhouse gas emissions.9 The way we produce food also contributes to antimicrobial resistance10 and non-communicable diseases, as well as emerging and foodborne diseases, and provides poor conditions for workers and vulnerability to price squeeze from input suppliers, processors and retailers. It also delivers poor animal welfare.

The impact of intensive animal farming

The climate, nature and health emergency we face is undoubtedly caused by multiple factors, a major one of which is intensive animal farming.

Issues such as climate change, biodiversity loss and public health can be collectively addressed through the elimination of factory farming and the move towards high welfare regenerative farming systems.

Impact

Continue reading to learn more about the scale of the impact of factory farming.

People, Planet, Animals
Impact

Despite the compelling evidence from multiple sectors, there has been limited action to begin to deliver a healthy and sustainable food system. Intensive animal farming continues to consume vast resources, including cereals and soy, to produce animal feed. Forests are destroyed and re-purposed into farmland and the intensification of crop production which, with its use of monocultures and agro-chemicals, has led to overuse and pollution of ground- and surface-water20, soil degradation21, 22, biodiversity loss23, and air pollution24. Policy makers may recognise the serious environmental crises we face but many are reluctant to acknowledge the part played by intensive animal production in generating these crises.

To address this, we need to RETHINK our food system and work collectively and creatively on the transition that will move us all towards a more humane, resilient, and sustainable food system.

Planetary Health Diet: Science-Backed Solution for Food & Climate

The EAT-Lancet Commission report (2019) on ‘Food, Planet, Health’, provided the first full scientific review for a healthy and sustainable diet and detailed the changes necessary to create a sustainable food future. The Commission’s reference diet or planetary health diet, provides a science-based framework for a flexible solution to stay within planetary boundaries, that will feed up to 10 billion people by 2050, limit a global temperature rise to less than two degrees and ensure optimal human health and nutritional guidelines. It also allows for adaptation to dietary needs, personal preferences and cultural traditions.

The planetary health diet is a global reference diet for adults that is symbolically represented by half a plate of fruits and vegetables. The other half consists of primarily whole grains, plant proteins (beans, lentils, pulses, nuts), unsaturated plant oils, modest amounts of meat and dairy, and some added sugars and starchy vegetables.

EAT forum.org25

Click on the tabs below to find out more.

The Planetary Health Diet

The Planetary Health Diet

Read more
    Macronutrient intake grams per day
(possible range)
Caloric intake kcal per day
Whole grains    
Rice, wheat, corn and other 232 811
Tubers or starchy vegetables    
Potatoes and cassava 50 (0–100) 39
Vegetables    
All vegetables 300 (200–600) 78
Fruits    
All fruits 200 (100–300) 126
Dairy foods    
Whole milk or equivalents 250 (0–500) 153
Protein sources    
Beef, lamb and pork 14 (0–28) 30
Chicken and other poultry 29 (0–58) 62
Eggs 13 (0–25) 19
Fish 28 (0–100) 40
Legumes 75 (0–100) 284
Nuts 50 (0–75) 291
Added fats    
Unsaturated oils 40 (20–80) 354
Saturated oils 11.8 (0-11.8) 96
Added sugars    
All sugars 31 (0–31) 120

Credit: EAT Lancet Commission: Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems

YouGov Meat Consumption Survey 2022

YouGov Meat Consumption Survey 2022

Read more
Call for reduction

Call for reduction

Read more

We aren't the only group calling for a reduction in the consumption of animal products - this is a view increasingly shared by several organisations:

Organisation Target Timeline
50by40 logo - the words 50by40
50by40
50% reduction in the global production and consumption of farmed animal products across all species 2040
Eating Better logo - name with red, green and blue circle next to it
Eating Better
50% reduction in meat and dairy consumption in the UK, remainder comes from "better" sources 2030
NRDC logo - A polar bear and star in a shield
Natural Resources Defense Council
20% reduction in GHG emissions from climate intensive foods N/A
World Resources Institute logo - name of organisation
World Resources Institute
25% reduction in food-related GHG emissions 2030
Friends of the Earth logo - a green circle above the name
Friends of the Earth
25% reduction in carbon emissions across supply chain and 25% reduction in factory farmed animal product purchases N/A
One NYC logo - the name
OneNYC2050
Phase out the purchase of processed meat and a 50% reduction in the purchase of beef 2050
C40 Cities logo - name on a green background
C40 Cities
Align food procurement with planetary health diet 2030
Greenpeace logo - name written in green
Greenpeace
50% reduction in production and consumption of animal products 2050
CIWF logo - lamb leaping with green circle behind
Compassion in World Farming
50% reduction in global production and consumption of animal products 2035 - high consuming countries
2050 - global
HSUS logo - the shape of the USA made up with images of animals
Humane Society of the United States
50% of total meals offered at institutional dining programmes in US are plant-based 2025
Putting sentience into food policy

Putting sentience into food policy

Read more

Henry Dimbleby, Co-Founder of Leon Restaurants and the Sustainable Restaurant Association

Food as the Problem, Food as the Solution

Food as the Problem, Food as the Solution

Read more

James Bailey, Executive Director, Waitrose

How plant-forward menus mean a triple-win for business

How plant-forward menus mean a triple-win for business

Read more

Rachel Eyre, Sustainable Procurement manager, Compass Group

Our More Money More Meat report (2023) reveals for the first time, how much each high- and middle- income country must reduce its consumption of animal sourced foods – meat, fish and seafood, dairy and eggs – in order to live within planetary health boundaries.

The planetary health diet represents a dramatic shift in consumption patterns with developed countries seeing a significant reduction in the amount of animal-based protein and a subsequent increase in plant-based proteins. It is recognised there are different challenges in developing countries with a need for local strategies to be devised in line with EAT Lancet dietary recommendations regarding sufficient protein intake. All regions, however, need to increase the consumption of vegetables, fruit, legumes, whole grains and nuts.

Alongside a significant reduction in the production of animals, Compassion and others are urging a further and equally dramatic transformation in production systems. All animals should be reared in higher welfare systems and there should be a significant move towards more regenerative agricultural practices.

  1. Rockström, J. Stockholm Resilience Centre, speaking on 24 June 2020 at EAT and The Rockefeller Foundation’s virtual event https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H--JgCgFec0&t=1s
  2. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009) doi:10.1038/461472a
  3. Quoted from an article by Sarah Bosely in The Guardian 28 January 2019 https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jan/27/food-industry-obesity-malnutrition-climate-change-report last viewed 31st July 2020
  4. FAO. (2016). Key facts on food loss and waste you should know. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/save-food/resources/keyfindings/en/
  5. Alexander et al (2016) Protein efficiency of meat and dairy production. Human appropriation of land for food: the role of diet. Global Environmental Change. Taken from Our World in Data
  6. FAO (n.d.) Main ethical issues in fisheries. [ONLINE] Available at http://www.fao.org/3/y6634e/y6634e04.html
  7. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. "More than 2 billion people overweight or obese, new study finds: Massive global research project reveals 30 percent of the world's population affected by weight problems." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 12 June 2017.
  8. GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators, Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systemic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017, The Lancet 393(10184), April 2019. https://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140-6736(19)30041-8/fulltext
  9. UNEP Global Environmental Outlook 2019 op.cit.
  10. World Health Organisation, 2011 http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2011/whd 20110406/en/
  11. http://www.fao.org/state-of-food-security-nutrition/en/
  12. https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/2020-02/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers_en.pdf
  13. https://www.who.int/activities/estimating-the-burden-of-foodborne-diseases
  14. Transforming food and agriculture to achieve the SDG’s http://www.fao.org/3/I9900EN/i9900en.pdf
  15. Xu X, Sharma P, Shu S, Lin TS, Ciais P, Tubiello FN, Smith P, Campbell N, Jain AK. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nat Food. 2021 Sep;2(9):724-732. Doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x. Epub 2021 Sep 13. PMID: 37117472.
  16. IPCC. SYNTHESIS REPORT OF THE IPCC SIXTH ASSESSMENT REPORT (AR6), 2023
  17. Harwatt, H. et al. (2019) ‘Scientists call for renewed Paris pledges to transform agriculture’, The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(1). doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(19)30245-1.
  18. https://ipbes.net/news/global-assessment-summary-policymakers-final-version-now-available
  19. FAO transforming food and agriculture to achieve SDG’s http://www.fao.org/3/I9900EN/i9900en.pdf
  20. Mekonnen, M. and Hoekstra, A., 2012. A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems.: DOI:10. 1007/s10021-011-9517-8
  21. Edmondson, J.L. et al., 2014. Urban cultivation in allotments maintains soil qualities adversely affected by conventional agriculture. Journal of Applied Ecology 2014,51,880-889
  22. Tsiafouli, MA. et al., 2015. Intensive agriculture reduces soil biodiversity across Europe. Global Change Biology:21, p973-985
  23. World Health Organisation and Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2015. Connecting global priorities: biodiversity and human health
  24. Lelieveld et al, 2015. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature, Vol 525
  25. The Planetary Health Diet. Eat. Online. Viewed 28 October 2020 https://eatforum.org/learn-and-discover/the-planetary-health-diet/
  26. Schader C et al. 2015. Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability. J. R. Soc. Interface 12: 20150891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0891

Powering a welfare and climate-friendly food system

Just as our current food system changed over 75 years ago in response to post World War ll food shortages, it can evolve again - to a more innovative, technological, humane and climate friendly system. It has to evolve. The current model is unsustainable.

Key to achieving this would be the “rebalancing of protein” from animal-based foods to a more plant-based diet including an increase in fruit and vegetable consumption. We anticipate reduction in animal-based consumption levels to vary according to regions as specified in the EAT-Lancet planetary health diet. Rebalancing the high levels of animal protein consumption in the US, Europe and other high consuming regions is essential for future sustainability.

Some governments and indeed cities are already calling for reduced meat consumption in their national dietary guidelines and are actively recommending plant-based sources of protein rather than animal-based.

A reduction in global consumption of animal protein by 53% by 2050 and the provision for livestock to forage and eat pasture and farming by-products, rather than human-edible crops in factory farms, would have the following impacts by 2050 compared to a business as usual approach.26

18% Reduction in GHG emissions
35% Reduction in non-renewable energy use
9% Reduction in the rate of global deforestation
12% Reduction in the rate of soil erosion
26% Reduction in the use of arable land
22% Reduction in the use of pesticides
46% Reduction in the use of nitrogen fertiliser
40% Reduction in the use of phosphorus fertiliser
21% Reduction in the use of freshwater for irrigation

Source: Schader C et al. 2015. Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability. J. R. Soc. Interface 12: 20150891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0891

By adopting further regenerative farming practices, we will amplify these impacts.

Food Choices, Big Impact: How Businesses Can Transform Our Food System

Food businesses have an incredible opportunity to help set a more sustainable path where people, planet and animals can thrive and live in harmony.

The decisions they make and the speed in which they are taken are crucial in addressing the enormous challenge of feeding the growing population within fixed planetary boundaries.

Whether through sourcing, pricing, marketing or product positioning - choice editing at scale – all these decisions impact heavily on our health, the environment and on the welfare of animals across the globe.

We urge companies to adopt a holistic approach to food production, reducing the impact of their animal footprint on animal welfare and the climate, nature and health crisis.

By setting clear targets to reduce the production and consumption of meat and other livestock products, coupled with investment in higher welfare and regenerative farming practices, we can drive change.

Many companies are investing heavily in improving animal welfare through adopting cage free policies and through initiatives like the Better Chicken Commitment.

Others are already harnessing nature and technology to meet growing consumer needs in this space. New plant-based products, cellular meat alternatives and innovative menu suggestions are being developed at pace across the food industry as food businesses look to ‘add’ protein alternatives. However, few businesses are ‘replacing’ animal-based protein altogether.

This is an exciting time for food businesses – for innovation, for investment and for being a part of a transformational change towards a ‘planetary resilient’ food system.

Find out more about what companies are doing in this space.

Get in touch

If you would like to know more about our Rethinking Food programme, please get in touch with our Food Business Team.

Globe

You are using an outdated browser which we do not support. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience and security.

If you have any further questions regarding this, or any other matter, please get in touch with us at supporters@ciwf.org.uk. We aim to respond to all queries within two working days. However, due to the high volume of correspondence that we receive, it may occasionally take a little longer. Please do bear with us if this is the case. Alternatively, if your query is urgent, you can contact our Supporter Engagement Team on +44 (0)1483 521 953 (lines open Monday to Friday 9am to 5pm).